Joint Application Development (JAD)

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/joint-application-development-jad.png
JAD primarily addresses friction related to process and coordination in software development. By facilitating collaboration and shared understanding among stakeholders and analysts, it aims to streamline workflows and improve coordination during the development lifecycle.

Joint Application Development (JAD) is a methodology that involves the client or end user in the design and development of an application, through a series of collaborative workshops called JAD sessions. This approach helps in eliciting requirements more effectively and ensures all parties are aligned from the start of the project. The use of JAD can lead to quicker development times and greater client satisfaction due to the continuous involvement and consensus-based decision-making process.

Steps / Detailed Description

Define the project scope and objectives. | Select participants for JAD sessions, including facilitators, developers, clients, and end users. | Prepare for sessions by gathering initial documentation and setting an agenda. | Conduct JAD sessions to discuss and document requirements and solutions. | Review and refine the outcomes from the JAD sessions with all stakeholders. | Prepare a final document that outlines the agreed upon design and requirements.

Best Practices

Ensure clear objectives and agenda for each session | Use experienced facilitators to guide discussions | Keep documentation thorough and up-to-date throughout the process

Pros

Enhances communication between stakeholders | Reduces development time by clarifying requirements early | Increases user satisfaction and system usability

Cons

Can be resource-intensive in terms of time and personnel | Dependent on effective facilitation and participation | Risk of scope creep if sessions are not well managed

When to Use

When developing complex systems requiring user input | When project scope is flexible and can benefit from collaborative input

When Not to Use

For small projects with limited budgets | When stakeholders are unavailable for frequent meetings

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Unknown
Unknown
Publication:
Unknown