Critical Incident Technique (CIT)

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/critical-incident-technique-cit.png
CIT helps gather factual data about significant occurrences, which can be used to improve implementation and address issues related to quality or customer experience based on observed incidents. This directly addresses friction points in the delivery and implementation phases.

The Critical Incident Technique (CIT) is a flexible method used primarily in service industries to identify and analyze events that have a significant impact on an operation or outcome. By focusing on specific incidents, rather than general operations, CIT allows organizations to pinpoint areas of success and failure. This targeted analysis helps in improving service delivery, enhancing training programs, and ensuring customer satisfaction.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify the purpose and scope of the analysis. | Determine and define what constitutes a 'critical incident' in the specific context. | Collect data through observations, interviews, or questionnaires. | Analyze the incidents to identify patterns or causal relationships. | Develop action plans based on the findings to improve or modify processes.

Best Practices

Clearly define what qualifies as a critical incident before data collection. | Ensure a diverse and representative sample of incidents. | Regularly update and review the criteria for critical incidents as services evolve.

Pros

Provides specific, actionable insights | Focuses on real-life situations | Enhances understanding of what drives customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction

Cons

Time-consuming data collection and analysis | Relies heavily on subjective interpretations | May not capture routine but important processes

When to Use

To improve customer service quality | For training and development of staff based on specific incidents

When Not to Use

When comprehensive, quantitative data is required | For routine performance assessments

Related Frameworks

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
John C. Flanagan
1954
Publication:
Psychological Bulletin