Power-Interest Grid

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/power-interest-grid.png
The Power-Interest Grid helps prioritize stakeholders, which is crucial for aligning efforts with those most impactful to strategic goals. This framework addresses the strategic friction of focusing on the right groups to achieve project success.

The Power-Interest Grid, also known as the Mendelow's Matrix, is a framework that helps organizations identify and prioritize stakeholders by categorizing them according to their power over and interest in a project. This matrix is crucial for effective stakeholder management, enabling organizations to tailor their engagement strategies to maximize support and minimize opposition. It aids in resource allocation, ensuring that the most influential stakeholders are kept satisfied and engaged.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify all potential stakeholders relevant to the project or decision. | Assess the power of each stakeholder, considering their influence on project outcomes. | Evaluate the level of interest of each stakeholder in the project's success or failure. | Plot stakeholders on a two-dimensional grid with 'Power' on the y-axis and 'Interest' on the x-axis. | Analyze the grid to determine the appropriate engagement strategy for each stakeholder group.

Best Practices

Regularly update the grid to reflect changes in stakeholder dynamics. | Combine with other analysis tools for comprehensive insights. | Engage stakeholders in assessing their own power and interest.

Pros

Helps in prioritizing stakeholders effectively. | Facilitates tailored communication strategies. | Enhances resource allocation by focusing on key influencers.

Cons

Can oversimplify stakeholder dynamics. | May not account for changes in stakeholder attitudes over time. | Risk of subjective assessment of power and interest.

When to Use

During the planning phase of a project. | When revising strategies due to significant changes in the project scope or environment.

When Not to Use

In highly dynamic environments where stakeholder positions frequently change. | When comprehensive, qualitative stakeholder analysis is required.

Related Frameworks

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Public Domain
N/A
Publication:
Generic Business Tool