Heuristic Evaluation Framework

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/heuristic-evaluation-framework.png
The Heuristic Evaluation Framework directly addresses customer experience issues by identifying usability problems in a user interface. This helps improve the customer's interaction with the product and ensures a smoother user experience during execution.

The Heuristic Evaluation Framework is a method for evaluating a user interface design based on predefined heuristics or general principles. It involves a small group of evaluators who independently assess the interface and identify usability issues. This framework is widely used because it is cost-effective, quick, and can be conducted without the involvement of actual users. It helps in improving the usability of products by identifying intuitive and user-centric design flaws.

Steps / Detailed Description

Select a set of appropriate heuristics. | Assemble a group of evaluators. | Brief the evaluators on the process and the heuristics. | Evaluators independently assess the product. | Compile the findings from all evaluators. | Discuss discrepancies and aggregate the results. | Provide a list of usability issues and potential improvements.

Best Practices

Use evaluators with varied expertise and familiarity with similar systems. | Ensure evaluators understand the heuristics thoroughly. | Review and discuss the findings collectively to minimize subjectivity.

Pros

Cost-effective compared to other usability testing methods. | Quick turnaround time, often requiring only a few days. | Can be performed without actual users, reducing the need for extensive user recruitment and scheduling.

Cons

Relies heavily on the expertise of the evaluators. | May not uncover all usability issues, as it does not involve real users. | Subjective differences between evaluators can affect consistency.

When to Use

Early stages of design to refine user interfaces. | When quick, iterative feedback on a product is needed.

When Not to Use

For detailed understanding of user behaviors and motivations. | When comprehensive and empirical usability testing is required.

Related Frameworks

Categories

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Jakob Nielsen, Rolf Molich
1990
Publication:
Nielsen Norman Group