Kanban Maturity Model

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/kanban-maturity-model.png
The Kanban Maturity Model primarily addresses friction related to process, workflow, and coordination. It focuses on improving Kanban practices, which directly impacts the orchestration and governance of work within an organization.

The Kanban Maturity Model is a framework that provides organizations with a roadmap to gradually improve their process capabilities through effective use of Kanban systems. It outlines a series of maturity levels, from initial visualization and workflow management to optimized and adaptive Kanban systems. The model helps organizations identify their current level of maturity and offers guidance on progressing to higher levels, thereby improving service delivery, predictability, and overall business agility.

Steps / Detailed Description

Assess current maturity level: Determine the organization's existing maturity level based on their current Kanban practices. | Define goals: Set specific, measurable goals for process improvement at each maturity level. | Implement practices: Adopt or enhance Kanban practices appropriate for the current maturity level. | Measure and evaluate: Regularly measure the impact of the implemented practices and evaluate progress towards the goals. | Evolve practices: Gradually introduce more advanced Kanban practices as the organization progresses through the maturity levels.

Best Practices

Start with a thorough assessment of the current maturity level | Engage all team members in the Kanban training and implementation process | Regularly review and adjust Kanban practices based on feedback and results

Pros

Structured approach to improvement | Enhanced predictability and efficiency | Scalable across different organizational sizes

Cons

Requires consistent commitment and discipline | May be complex to implement without proper guidance | Potential resistance to change within teams

When to Use

When seeking to improve workflow and process efficiency | When an organization needs a scalable method to manage growth and change

When Not to Use

In very small teams where informal processes suffice | Where rapid, disruptive change is needed immediately

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
David J. Anderson
2018
Publication:
Lean Kanban University