Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/customer-satisfaction-score-csat.png
CSAT directly measures customer satisfaction with the delivered product or service experience. Poor CSAT scores indicate execution issues related to customer experience, product quality, or service delivery.

The Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) is a straightforward metric used to gauge the satisfaction levels of customers regarding a specific product, service, or interaction. It typically involves asking customers to rate their satisfaction on a scale, often from 1 to 5. CSAT is a valuable tool for businesses to quickly assess customer feelings and identify areas for improvement. Its simplicity and directness make it a popular choice among businesses of all sizes to measure customer sentiment.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify the touchpoint or interaction to evaluate. | Design a survey question that asks customers to rate their satisfaction level. | Choose a scoring scale (e.g., 1-5, where 5 is very satisfied). | Distribute the survey to customers after the interaction. | Collect responses and calculate the average score. | Analyze the results to identify satisfaction trends and areas for improvement.

Best Practices

Ensure the survey is short and to the point to increase response rates | Regularly update the survey questions to reflect current customer concerns | Combine CSAT with other metrics like NPS for a more comprehensive view

Pros

Simple to implement and understand | Provides immediate feedback from customers | Helps pinpoint specific areas needing improvement

Cons

Limited by its focus on specific interactions | Does not measure loyalty or long-term satisfaction | Can be influenced by external factors not related to the product or service

When to Use

After a customer support interaction | Following a purchase or service experience

When Not to Use

For measuring long-term customer loyalty | When comprehensive, in-depth feedback is required

Related Frameworks

Categories

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Public Domain
N/A
Publication:
Generic Business Tool