CIPP Evaluation Model

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/cipp-evaluation-model.png
The CIPP model helps to evaluate the inputs, processes, and outputs of programs, projects, and systems, which directly addresses the efficiency and effectiveness of operational workflows. It focuses on ensuring that operations are aligned with desired outcomes and identifying areas for improvement in how work gets done.

The CIPP Evaluation Model, standing for Context, Input, Process, and Product, is a framework designed to assess different aspects of programs and projects. It helps organizations in making informed decisions by evaluating the planning, implementation, and effectiveness of their initiatives. The model is widely appreciated for its holistic approach, which not only assesses the outcomes but also the strategies, processes, and contextual factors influencing them.

Steps / Detailed Description

Context Evaluation: Assess the environment and identify needs and objectives. | Input Evaluation: Analyze resources, strategies, and action plans. | Process Evaluation: Monitor and document the implementation process. | Product Evaluation: Measure and evaluate the outcomes and impacts.

Best Practices

Clearly define the scope and objectives at the outset | Engage stakeholders throughout the evaluation process | Use systematic data collection and analysis methods

Pros

Provides a comprehensive evaluation framework | Facilitates informed decision-making | Focuses on both process and outcome

Cons

Can be time-consuming | Requires extensive data collection | May be complex to implement without proper training

When to Use

Evaluating educational programs | Assessing government policies

When Not to Use

When rapid decision-making is required | For small-scale or less complex projects

Related Frameworks

Categories

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Daniel Stufflebeam
1971
Publication:
Western Michigan University