Keeley's Ten Types of Innovation

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/keeleys-ten-types-of-innovation.png
Keeley's framework primarily addresses strategic friction by providing a comprehensive guide to innovation avenues, helping organizations define their innovation strategy and identify opportunities beyond just product features. It guides companies to broaden their strategic perspective on innovation and align on key areas for growth.

Keeley's Ten Types of Innovation framework provides a comprehensive approach to understanding and implementing innovation across different aspects of a business. It categorizes innovation into ten types, each focusing on different areas such as product features, customer engagement, and internal processes. This framework helps organizations to identify new opportunities for growth and differentiation, ensuring a holistic approach to innovation that can lead to sustainable competitive advantage.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify the current innovation landscape of your organization. | Select the relevant types of innovation to focus on based on strategic goals. | Generate ideas and solutions within each selected innovation type. | Develop prototypes or pilot programs to test these ideas in real-world scenarios. | Evaluate the results and refine the innovations based on feedback and data. | Implement the successful innovations across the organization.

Best Practices

Start with a clear understanding of your business strategy. | Focus initially on a few types of innovation that align closely with business goals. | Involve cross-functional teams to leverage diverse perspectives.

Pros

Provides a structured approach to innovation | Encourages a broad view of potential innovation areas | Facilitates differentiation and competitive advantage

Cons

Can be complex to implement across all ten types | May require significant resources and time | Risk of spreading efforts too thin without clear focus

When to Use

When seeking to overhaul or refresh the business model | When entering a new market or launching new products

When Not to Use

In very small or resource-constrained startups | When quick, tactical changes are needed rather than strategic overhauls

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Doblin Group, Larry Keeley
2003
Publication:
Doblin Group