Just Enough Architecture

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/just-enough-architecture.png
Just Enough Architecture aims to mitigate technical friction and implementation complexity by advocating for a balance between design and practicality. This directly impacts the delivery speed and quality of software development, ultimately influencing the customer experience.

Just Enough Architecture is a principle in software development that advocates for designing systems that are 'just enough' complex to meet current requirements, but flexible enough to adapt to future needs. This approach helps in avoiding over-engineering and under-engineering, ensuring that the architecture is scalable, maintainable, and cost-effective. It emphasizes iterative development, where architectural decisions are made based on the most current information available.

Steps / Detailed Description

Define the minimum viable architecture to start the project. | Implement the architecture iteratively, adapting to changes in requirements. | Continuously evaluate the architecture's effectiveness and make incremental improvements. | Involve stakeholders in architectural decisions to ensure alignment with business goals. | Document key architectural decisions for future reference and compliance.

Best Practices

Start with a clear understanding of the core requirements. | Engage in continuous learning and feedback loops with stakeholders. | Maintain documentation and keep architectural decisions transparent.

Pros

Prevents over-engineering and reduces development costs. | Increases flexibility and adaptability to changes. | Enhances focus on delivering business value.

Cons

Risk of under-engineering if initial requirements are poorly understood. | May require frequent reassessment and redesign. | Relies heavily on the team's ability to make sound architectural decisions quickly.

When to Use

In agile development environments where requirements can change frequently. | When developing new products with uncertain or evolving specifications.

When Not to Use

In projects with very rigid and well-defined requirements. | When compliance with strict architectural standards is required.

Related Frameworks

Categories

Lifecycle

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Unknown
N/A
Publication:
Unknown