EFQM

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/efqm.png
The EFQM Model assesses performance across various criteria, focusing on areas like leadership, strategy, people, partnerships, and results. This holistic approach helps organizations identify and improve their processes, workflows, and overall management systems to achieve excellence.

The EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) Model is a comprehensive management framework used by organizations to improve performance and achieve excellence. It provides a holistic tool for assessing where organizations are on the path to excellence, helping them understand their gaps, and offering solutions for improvement. The framework encourages organizations to be sustainable by balancing the needs of all stakeholders. It is widely used across Europe and globally by organizations seeking to implement a culture of continuous improvement.

Steps / Detailed Description

Understand the EFQM Model and its criteria. | Conduct a self-assessment of the organization against the EFQM criteria. | Analyze the results to identify gaps and areas of improvement. | Develop an action plan based on the assessment findings. | Implement the action plan and monitor progress. | Review and refine the strategy and processes based on feedback and new insights.

Best Practices

Regularly update training and development for staff on the EFQM model. | Engage all stakeholders in the assessment and improvement processes. | Use the model as a guide rather than a strict rulebook.

Pros

Promotes a holistic approach to organizational improvement. | Facilitates benchmarking and self-assessment. | Encourages continuous improvement and innovation.

Cons

Can be complex and time-consuming to implement. | May require significant resources and training. | Risk of focusing too much on scoring rather than actual improvement.

When to Use

When seeking a structured approach to improve organizational performance. | When aiming to align various aspects of the organization towards common goals.

When Not to Use

If the organization lacks the resources to fully commit to the comprehensive assessment process. | When immediate, short-term fixes are needed over long-term strategic improvement.

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
EFQM
1991
Publication:
EFQM