Discovery-Driven Planning

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/discovery-driven-planning.png
Discovery-Driven Planning tackles the strategic friction of high uncertainty and unclear direction in projects. It addresses the lack of a defined path by enabling learning and adaptation, which is crucial when the market or technology is unknown.

Discovery-Driven Planning (DDP) is a framework used to approach business ventures and projects characterized by high uncertainty. It allows companies to systematically uncover and test assumptions, adapting plans as new learnings emerge. This method is particularly beneficial for new market entries, product launches, or innovative initiatives, where traditional planning methods based on predictable outcomes are less effective.

Steps / Detailed Description

Define the project's success metrics and ultimate objectives. | List all assumptions underlying the project's success. | Convert assumptions into testable hypotheses. | Develop a reverse income statement to understand financial implications. | Create a milestone planning chart to identify critical checkpoints. | Implement a learning plan to test hypotheses and validate assumptions.

Best Practices

Regularly review and update assumptions based on new data. | Focus on key metrics that will drive decision-making. | Encourage a culture of learning and flexibility within the team.

Pros

Reduces risk by identifying and testing assumptions early. | Increases flexibility and adaptability in project planning. | Enhances learning and insights from the project process.

Cons

Can be time-consuming due to continuous testing and validation. | May require more resources to adapt to changing plans. | Potentially difficult to maintain focus on original project goals.

When to Use

Launching a new product in an unfamiliar market. | Entering a business venture with high levels of uncertainty.

When Not to Use

Projects with clear, well-understood markets and customer needs. | Situations where speed to market is more critical than learning.

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Rita Gunther McGrath and Ian C. MacMillan
1995
Publication:
Harvard Business Review