Ansoff Matrix

Diagram of the Ansoff Matrix showing four growth strategies: Market Penetration, Product Development, Market Development, and Diversification. The matrix compares existing versus new products on the horizontal axis and existing versus new markets on the vertical axis, with each quadrant color-coded.
The Ansoff Matrix primarily addresses strategic friction by providing a framework for identifying and evaluating growth opportunities related to market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. It helps businesses clarify their direction and strategy in terms of growth.

The Ansoff Matrix, developed by Igor Ansoff in 1957, is a business framework that helps organizations map strategic product market growth. The matrix presents four strategies for growth: market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. Businesses use the Ansoff Matrix to assess the potential risks of growth initiatives and to make decisions that align with their overall strategy and resources.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify current products and markets to establish a baseline. | Analyze opportunities for market penetration with existing products. | Explore new markets for current products to assess market development potential. | Consider developing new products for existing markets. | Evaluate the possibility of diversification by introducing new products into new markets.

Best Practices

Regularly update market and product information to ensure accuracy. | Use in conjunction with other analytical tools for comprehensive analysis. | Align the chosen strategy with overall business objectives and capabilities.

Pros

Provides a clear framework for evaluating growth opportunities. | Helps in risk assessment by categorizing strategic options. | Facilitates strategic thinking and decision-making.

Cons

Can oversimplify the complexities of some markets and products. | May not account for changes in the external environment. | Relies heavily on the assumption that pursuing new products or markets always involves higher risks.

When to Use

When considering expansion or growth strategies. | When a business needs to reassess its current market and product strategies.

When Not to Use

In highly volatile markets where conditions change unpredictably. | When a company lacks the resources to pursue new market or product opportunities.

Related Frameworks

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Igor Ansoff
1957
Publication:
Harvard Business Review