70-20-10 Innovation Framework

Diagram of the 70โ€“20โ€“10 Innovation Framework showing three investment categories: Core (70%), Adjacent (20%), and Transformational (10%). Each category lists key characteristics such as optimization, expansion, and high-risk innovation. The bottom row provides examples including feature optimizations, cost reduction, new product variations, service add-ons, new business models, emerging tech prototypes, and moonshot ideas.
The 70-20-10 framework primarily addresses strategic friction by providing a structured approach to allocating resources for innovation. It helps organizations balance exploration (new ideas) with exploitation (refining existing offerings) and risk management, which are core strategic decisions.

The 70-20-10 Innovation Framework is a strategic tool used by organizations to balance their investment across core, adjacent, and transformational initiatives. It suggests allocating 70% of resources to core business activities, 20% to adjacent innovations, and 10% to transformational efforts. This distribution helps companies maintain competitiveness while also investing in future growth and innovation.

Steps / Detailed Description

Identify core, adjacent, and transformational projects within your organization. | Allocate resources according to the 70-20-10 rule: 70% to core, 20% to adjacent, 10% to transformational. | Implement projects while monitoring progress and adjusting allocations as needed. | Measure the impact of each type of project on overall business performance. | Refine and iterate the innovation strategy based on feedback and results.

Best Practices

Regularly review and adjust the resource allocation | Ensure clear definitions and criteria for categorizing projects | Foster a culture that supports all types of innovation

Pros

Encourages a balanced approach to innovation | Reduces risk by diversifying investment | Promotes long-term sustainability and growth

Cons

Can be challenging to correctly categorize projects | May lead to underfunding transformative ideas | Requires constant adjustment and monitoring

When to Use

In companies seeking balanced growth | When diversifying product or service offerings

When Not to Use

In startups or companies with limited resources | When immediate returns are a priority over long-term innovation

Related Frameworks

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

1โ€“2 Months
2โ€“4 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Months
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Days
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
2โ€“4 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Days
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3โ€“6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3โ€“6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Months
3โ€“6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3โ€“6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Days
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3โ€“6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
3โ€“6 Months
3โ€“6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1โ€“2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1โ€“2 Months
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks
1โ€“2 Weeks

Copyright Information

Autor:
Unknown
Unknown
Publication:
Unknown