Waterfall Model

https://ik.imagekit.io/beyondpmf/frameworks/waterfall-model.png
The Waterfall Model primarily addresses friction related to the sequential nature of software development. It aims to reduce problems with coordination, handoffs between phases, and the orchestration of tasks by providing a structured, step-by-step process.

The Waterfall Model is a linear and sequential approach to software development and project management, characterized by a series of distinct phases that flow downwards like a waterfall. Each phase must be completed before the next begins, with little to no overlap between phases. This model is used because of its simplicity and ease of understanding, making it suitable for projects with clear objectives and stable requirements. It is beneficial for its ability to enforce discipline, meticulous record-keeping, and thorough documentation.

Steps / Detailed Description

Requirement Gathering and Documentation: Define project goals, specifications, and requirements clearly. | System Design: Translate requirements into a software architecture. | Implementation: Code the software according to the design documents. | Integration and Testing: Combine and test the system for defects. | Deployment: Release the fully tested software to the market. | Maintenance: Update and fix the software as needed post-deployment.

Best Practices

Ensure clear, detailed, and agreed-upon requirements | Maintain comprehensive documentation at each phase | Plan for potential risks and incorporate risk management strategies

Pros

Simple and easy to understand and use | Structured and disciplined approach | Facilitates meticulous documentation

Cons

Inflexible, as it is difficult to go back to any stage after it is completed | Poor adaptability to changing requirements | High risk and uncertainty in integration stage

When to Use

Projects with clear, fixed requirements | Projects where a structured approach is paramount

When Not to Use

Projects that are likely to have requirement changes | Projects requiring frequent testing and feedback

Related Frameworks

No related frameworks listed

Lifecycle

Not tied to a specific lifecycle stage

Scope

Scope not defined

Maturity Level

Maturity level not specified

Time to Implement

2–4 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
2–4 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
1–2 Months
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Days
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
3–6 Months
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
3–6 Months
3–6 Months
Less Than 1 Day
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months
1–2 Months
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
1–2 Weeks
Longer Than 6 Months

Copyright Information

Autor:
Winston W. Royce
1970
Publication:
Proceedings of the IEEE