← BACK TO ALL CASES
ARCHETYPE·INDUSTRY·ERA

Want To, Not Have To

AAACHT AG

·

06/2024 – 08/2024

An early-stage AG whose risk order was financing > market > product — and in which a product function, however cleanly built, cannot substitute for the missing financing and incorporation setup.

01 — TRIGGER

AAACHT AG was a German early-stage joint-stock company with the ambition to sell AI consulting to mid-sized German companies. Six people on the team. Three worlds in their CVs: operational IT (system management), software engineering, sales.

What was missing on the team: someone who knew from experience how to turn an idea into a product, how to structure a consulting portfolio that could actually be sold, how to build a function that would carry that work durably.

Closing that gap was my brief as Chief Product Officer on a fixed term. Three months, June through August 2024.

02 — THE REAL PROBLEM

The brief broke down into two threads.

First: a consulting portfolio that doesn't begin and end with “we do AI”, but that has a staircase a mid-sized firm can walk up.

The lowest step: a standard offering via an online tool, with a chatbot delivering an instant teaser result. Low-friction. A managing director in a mid-sized firm clicks through it in the evening, gets a first read ten minutes later, knows whether the topic is relevant for their business.

Above that, in stages: workshops for needs assessment. Coaching for the leadership team. Trainings for the workforce. And at the top: bespoke AI development for clients whose use cases left the standard solution behind.

Second: the product-management function as a lasting structure — method, roles, handover points between sales, engineering and customer, reporting.

Both threads were set up at the end of the three months and handed over to the management board.

03 — A CHARACTERISTIC SCENE

The peak of the three months was a two-day hybrid launch event with more than 150 participants. The company and the consulting offering were presented.

The concept was clean. The day's dramaturgy was thought through. Day one ran with high energy and tangible resonance in the room.

Not coincidentally, the date also coincided with the birthdays of two founders. The launch was therefore also a birthday celebration. That is humanly understandable and not a taboo in a small firm — but it has an effect on the second half of a two-day event. When day one celebrates late, day two is slow. For a launch whose job is to draw clients into the consulting offer, a slow day two costs more than it appears to. The most important conversations that could have happened did not happen in that form, because too many in the room were tired.

That is not a moral point. It is an observation that the stage a launch is only delivers its effect if the actors stand on it rested at the right time.

04 — WHAT WE BUILT

Three things did not run, in the months after my handover, the way they would have needed to run for what we built to reach the market.

The AG incorporation was delayed. Constituting a joint-stock company in Germany is a regulatory and procedural journey. The formal hurdles took longer than the business plan had foreseen.

Equity-based financing did not come through at the required level. The business model assumed that, after incorporation, tranches would be financed through share issuance. That did not carry at the volume needed.

The market for AI consulting in the German Mittelstand turned out to be tougher than the business model had assumed. Long buying cycles, high evidentiary thresholds, scepticism about external AI promises. That is the 2024 reality in that segment, and a business plan that doesn't price that reality into its tempo and cash burn enters stress.

The sum of those three points: the company was subsequently dissolved.

05 — OUTCOME

Consulting portfolio and PM function built and handed over to the management board in three months, launch event with 150+ participants; the company was subsequently dissolved — the two transferable lessons (risk order in an early-stage AG; AI adoption as a change sale) carry beyond AAACHT.

06 — WHAT REMAINS

  1. A product function can be built in three months, if you build the portfolio first and the methodology after. The reflex in young teams is to start with methodology — frameworks, processes, tools. That delivers nothing as long as the portfolio isn't concrete. The order is: first the staircase the customer walks onto, then the maintenance of that staircase as an internal function. At AAACHT this order was right, and it was achievable in three months.
  2. Selling AI consulting to the German Mittelstand is change selling, not efficiency selling. The standard sales story for AI consulting — “we lower your costs, we accelerate your processes” — is an efficiency story. It misses the actual lever. The lever is: AI, like any new technology, is a change topic. The efficiency gains AI promises can only be realised if employees want to adopt the technology, not have to adopt it. Business models that don't put that at the centre sell a promise that doesn't materialise on use — and the Mittelstand feels that gap faster than other markets, because every managing director is on the shop floor on Wednesday and can see whether the technology is being used.
  3. A small early-stage AG is more a business-model construction than a product construction. The order of risks is not “can the product work” → “does it find a market” → “can it be financed”. In an AG early phase the order is reversed: the financing and incorporation risk decides first, the market risk second, the product risk third. A function that works only on the third risk cannot save the second or the first. Whoever enters this setup as a product owner should know that — and should make it clear to the founders on day one, not on day ninety.

Working through a similar shift?

If something on this page resonated, the QuickCheck takes four minutes and gives you a structural read of where you actually are.